July 2007

Story Tools
   Email This Article
   Print This Article
   Add Your Comments
   Subscribe Now!
Related Articles
   MARTIN D-28 HW
   Killer Body


Rate This Article
Low   High
Current rating: 5 stars by 2 users

Most Popular Articles
   The Guitars of Randy Rhoads
   The Tao of Jol
   Review: Carol-Ann OD2r
   PG Experience: Exclusive George Lynch Videos
   Review: Hahn Model 228

Highest Rated Articles
   The Acoustic Arts
   Theo Hartman: Mojo Agnostic
   Magnum Opus J-6250WC Jumbo Cutaway
   Dimebag's Dean of Destiny
   Shred Outside the Box

    
July 2007 \ Features \ Product Review \ Composite Acoustics GX Performer

Composite Acoustics GX Performer

by James Egolf

The GX shrugged off everything thrown at it, whether it was ham-fisted flatpicking or delicate fingerstyle arrangements, which is a lot to ask from any Grand Auditorium-sized guitar, let alone one from the future.




Composite Acoustics GX Performer Recently, during a visit to the local boutique acoustic store, the owner insisted that I try a new guitar. He often insists that I try new guitars, and I have found it easier to try the guitars in question rather than argue with him. He told me, “You’re gonna love this,” to which I gave my standard reply of “Hmm.” Then, when he grabbed the Darth Vader-looking acoustic off the wall, my heart broke a little bit. I thought we had made more of a connection over the past couple of years of me visiting his store – hadn’t he ever listened to the things I shared with him? Didn’t he remember me talking lovingly about my beat up D-18V? He certainly hadn’t recalled that I enjoyed picking bluegrass tunes. All of the sudden, our relationship seemed awfully one-sided


Discovery
I begrudgingly accepted him thrusting the guitar into my hands, looking more like something that should be bolted underneath a late-model Acura than used to make music. He identified it as a Composite Acoustics Bluegrass Standard model; the name indicated that, just perhaps, he had been listening to me all along. Grabbing the guitar, I noticed that the neck wasn’t ridiculously thin. In fact, it was what could be referred to as substantial. In the past, builders using composite materials forgot that just because something could be done didn’t mean it should be, and pencil-thin necks were often the misguided result. I reckoned then it was at least worthy of a thorough checking-out.

pulled a pick out of my pocket and played – what else? – a bluegrass riff in G. My whole world was suddenly set on its ear. All the preconceptions I had been cultivating – graphite equals cold, graphite equals dead, graphite equals weird-sounding upper harmonics – swiftly flew out the window. I left soon thereafter, partly due to other obligations, partly to digest what had just happened.

As soon as I returned to the office, and spent some time discussing the MusicWood Coalition and the future of alternative materials in instrument design with the staff, I realized we had to get one in for review – graphite is certainly poised to be a part of guitar culture in the future. A quick call and short conversation with a gentleman named Gerd, and we had a GX Performer on the way.


The Arrival
When the guitar arrived, the temperature was in the 50s, so I wasted no time in unpacking the GX, giving it no acclimation time. I grabbed a G chord almost as soon as I could pull the guitar out of its case and it rang out clearly and in tune, with the relief being just where it should be.

If anything, I found the GX even more impressive than the Bluegrass model, since it has all of the great playability and close to the same volume as its bigger sibling, while coming in at a smaller, more comfortable Grand Auditorium size, and sporting a rather severe – and very cool looking – cutaway that occupies the area normally reserved for the neck heel. Pitting it in a seemingly unfair comparison with my D-18V, the GX once again held its own; not failing in the expected bass registers, where cutaways tend to have issues, but in its inability to deliver that extra little amount of harmonic sparkle on the high-end, just as the notes and chords begin to decay. Mind you, this was from out front, about ten feet away and three or four feet up from the soundhole, where the sound really begins to focus.

From the player’s vantage point, the guitar feels quick and responsive, with the only negative being a little boxiness when driven too hard. The GX shrugged off everything thrown at it, whether it was ham-fisted flatpicking or delicate fingerstyle arrangements, which is a lot to ask from any Grand Auditorium-sized guitar, let alone one from the future.


Composite Acoustics GX Performer


Composite Benefits
Earlier efforts in building guitars from composite materials left the braces out of the equation, because they weren’t needed structurally. Composite Acoustics figured out that, tonally, they were needed. Better is a subjective term, but this certainly makes their guitars deliver what we traditionally associate as good tone. Something else that is available using non-traditional materials and construction techniques is the ability to round contours to reduce the incidence of standing waves. Composite materials can be fashioned into other previously impossible shapes for various tone-shaping and ergonomic reasons.

If you are looking for a really nice guitar that can actually be taken out and played, this very well may be the one. It can be left in the trunk when you go grab a bite – out of sight and out of mind. It can be taken to the outdoor festival in July and played all day with no worries. It won’t crack. Let that point settle in a bit. That means no more anxiety about the humidity level in your case or your house, which in turn means no more case humidifiers. No more seasonal truss rod adjustments. Just play the thing, whenever, wherever you want. It is without a doubt the most viable travel guitar option out there, as well as a great instrument for festival performers. This guitar doesn’t shy away from anything.


The Final Mojo
As a kid growing up in Indiana, our library had some fascinating old books written in the ‘50s about living in the future. According to these books, we were all supposed to be driving around in nuclear-powered, three-wheeled rocket cars by the 1980s. That sounds decidedly cooler than a Toyota Prius to me, but that isn’t how things have worked out. I can accept that. What I have trouble accepting is the thought of my son, or one of his children in the future, not being able to get a great sounding acoustic, one that inspires them to pick it up and to play, maybe even write a few tunes. Composite Acoustics are doing their best to make it happen, and for that, I’m more than happy to trade my rocket car.


Rating...
Tone...  
Craftsmanship...  
Features...  
Value...  
Overall...  




Composite Acoustics
MSRP $3350
compositeacoustics.com






Commentary

UsernameComment
1 2 
T. Murphy
on 10/08/2008
I recently played a GX at the local Boutique acoustic store. I didn't want to play it, I didn't want to like it, and I certainly didn't want to buy it...until I played it. It was well balanced, full, responsive with the sparkly high end my d-28 is missing. As soon as I can talk my wife into another guitar it will be mine.
KMA
on 07/24/2008
I love my RainSong! I love a super slim neck and got one in the cheaper A-WS1000 model, and with this model I don't have to look at that carbon graphite weave on the soundboard because it's got an opaque black finish. It's a little quieter and definitely not a wooden guitar sound, but I love it for it's clarity and immediate response. I put a K&K Pure Western in mine to add warmth to the Fishman and I turn heads with the live sound! I've got a Martin J-40 I seldom play anymore - think I'm going to sell it. It's just too muddy sounding to me for anything other than fingerstyle playing, and this RainSong does that very nicely, too. I've played the more expensive hand-made RainSongs and didn't like the feel or sound. I just bought a CA GX Performer wanting a louder guitar for when I'm not plugged in. One of these will be my backup. You just can't beat a decent (I think better) sound in a guitar with such precise action and a bulletproof construction. You folks can keep your wood-made nostalgia. I'm digging what I see as the future of guitars today.
Jim
on 04/30/2008
I have owned two, the first being the bluegrass model, and the second (current) being the GX player. I was not fond of the bluegrass, but am totaly in love with the playability and tone of the GX. Very comfortable to play and the sound, while slightly different from a woodbox, has it's own distinct characteristics, and is very good. Don't discount these unless you have given one a test drive.
Mark
on 03/11/2008
I've done more than a few blindfold tests with guitar geeks who swore they could tell the difference. Wrong! You simply have to listen with your ears & not your eyes. I confess to not wanting to like them, but they are truly remarkable guitars.
Jeff Auen
on 02/26/2008
I bought a CA X Performer model for travel. Very thin. Small. Light weight. DURABLE! Impervious. I leave it in the sun on the beach. I leave it in my trunk on a ski trip. Awesome.

I now use it as one of my 2 main guitars on stage (the other is an Alvarez Yairi MM). It plays like a dream. The electronics are fantastic through my Bose L1. I play folk, rock and a lot of fingerstyle. I can blow the doors off the place with Tommy Emmanuel style tunes.

I get more positive comments about the guitar's sound than I ever received with any other guitar I've used on stage (Taylor 815CE, Ovation Elite, Carvin AE185).

I plan to buy another one soon.

- Jeff
- www.echangeofpace.com
Dave de la Rosa
on 02/09/2008
My friend just brought over a CA Vintage Performer, left it with me for a few weeks... I've got Martin, Collings, National, Guild, and love them all. I play a lot of different styles from swing to folk to rock, so I can appreciate ALL the different guitar sounds in the world... ever heard a National Duolian sing? The CA is not a wooden guitar, and it doesn't sound quite like one, but in the hands of a seasoned guitarist, it has a nice voice, all it's own. The Vintage Performer, now in my hands, has a quality similar to a Martin... meaning, although it does not duplicate the sound of my D-18GE, everything that I would play on my D-18 sounds quite pleasant on the CA. The value of having a guitar that plays very well, is comfortable to hold, sounds really, really good (albeit, not a wood sound) and is made such that you can leave it in the trunk of your car?... you could probably paddle a canoe with the thing, then play it when you hit the beach, and still be in tune... it is certainly worth more than a little consideration. I personally want one for the road, to play plugged in, or songwriting at the beach. It's a perfect second or third guitar if you like wood, but don't want to take your Martin to the beach; and probably an ideal "only" guitar, if you don't have ideal humidity control. Don't be ashamed, there are some big names playing these guitars now, hardcore wood-guitar guys that are tired of babying them on the road.
Gil Solano
on 01/21/2008
To all who have not played the CA yet and have put there "2 cents" in, shame on you!! First of all, this is nothing like you've ever played before so get out of the kool-aide if you don't know the flavor. All praises to the CA for its durability, feel, and sound. Plays better than any other I have played for the exception of the laravee.
Jeff Stockford
on 10/24/2007
I just got a Composite Acoustics dreadnaught (COT model). Up until now I have been a "wood snob." That has all changed now. I love the fact that it styas in tune for the duration of the sound check and the set and is still in tune when I break it out the next day. It sounds a little different then my Martin 000028H or my Avalon, but hey, different isn't bad. I plan to play my CA guitar for a long time!
keefer
on 06/28/2007
I played one at a local dealers and was not impressed with the tone unplugged but it came alive thru one of his Ultrasound amps. Playability was excellent in my opinion. I'm a wood guy so it's not for me, but theese types have come a long way in a short time.
hotaxe
on 06/27/2007
First of all, I am prejudiced.

I'm pretty sure my ears could pick out a graphite from a wood guitar any day of the week, if I had the chance to take the blind-folded Pepsi challenge. To me, the tonal differences between a wooden and graphite instrument are numerous. These differences are often subtle, but they are CRUCIAL. Every graphite guitar I've ever held has the following two major issues:
1. The bottom end sounds compressed to the point of being totally stepped on. The sound is focused but flat- it's just two dimensional in a 3-D world. I'd liken this to giving up everything analog to run to the digital world.
2. The high end is clear, but not sparkly; it sounds like the high notes are coming off of aluminum foil.

thepicker: I've also been unimpressed with the Rainsongs, but haven't seen a Composite Acoustic yet. My 2 cents: graphite is for pencils and golf clubs, not guitars. This article made me want to go plant a bunch of trees to ensure that my children can play better guitars. Perhaps one day, all guitars will come with laser beams and will also be able to receive text messages and high-def TV. Luckily, we haven't killed all the trees yet.

Pave paradise. Put up a parking lot.



Your Comment:  

All comments are subject to editing or deletion by the Premier Guitar staff.

Your Name:  


Please enter the text you see in the image:  

     Get your own Subscription to PG Today!


Link to this Article

Want to link to this article? Just copy and paste the text below into your website.

Related Articles
   MARTIN D-28 HW, Apr 2007
   Killer Body, Mar 2007
9FA5BA8A-E64B-4EEE-901C-8CC951BFB0DF 321